Drafts, research memos and client documents can now come from an AI tool as easily as from a colleague. Winston AI highlights passages that read as machine-written so a lawyer knows where to verify most carefully. This page offers practical steps, not legal advice: your firm's policies and the rules of your court always come first.
The duty to check doesn't change
However a draft was produced, the lawyer who files or sends it is responsible for its contents. Rules on AI use vary by court and jurisdiction, and they keep changing, so follow your firm's policies and the requirements of each court you appear before. A detection scan doesn't replace that review. It helps you decide where to spend your closest reading.
Practical steps for a careful review
- Treat any statement of law, case citation or quotation in a flagged passage as unverified until you've read the source.
- Don't skip yellow sentences: lightly edited generated text can still carry a wrong citation.
- Keep drafts and version history, so you can show how a document developed if questions come up.
- Agree inside the team on when AI tools may be used and how that use is recorded.
Where detection helps most
It's most useful on work you didn't draft yourself: a contract attorney's research memo, a first draft from a junior colleague, a letter a client wrote and wants you to review. Highlights point to the sections worth checking line by line, and a shareable report lets a supervising lawyer and an associate talk through the same passages. A clean result is not a substitute for cite-checking. For the limits of any score, see can AI detectors be wrong.